CORE Blog

He kōrerorero, he whakaaro

CORE Blog

He kōrerorero, he whakaaro
CORE Blog
He kōrerorero, he whakaaro
  • HomeKāinga
  • About usMātou nei
  • CORE WebsitePAENGA CORE

Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

Home
/
Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould
student mind map

Inter-disciplinary indigenous understandings

Posted on June 16, 2017 by Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

Connecting Learning Using an Inter-Disciplinary Indigenous Understandings Inquiry Focus: “How does where one lives affect how one lives?”

At the first day of the Network of Innovation and Inquiry (NOII) Symposium, participants had the opportunity to attend break-out sessions presented by schools. One of the break-outs we chose, was that of Dover Bay Secondary School from School District 68 Nanaimo Ladysmith.

The presenters, Lynn Brown, Robyn Grey, Brett Hancock, Michelle James, Tanya Lebans, and Carson Williams told their story of how they built a framework of community values for all learners (including adults) to ensure a strong emphasis on indigenous understandings in each core subject. They used an inter-disciplinary inquiry approach to do this. The following is a summary of their story:

Scanning

To begin their journey the team scanned their teachers asking, “what is going on for our teachers?”, so that they could inform their plans to build a cross-curricular inquiry project.

Focusing, hunchwork and learning

Following their scan, they used teachers’ starting points to inform the ways in which they would use and recognise indigenous understandings as an entry point for connecting interdisciplinary competencies. Teachers hunched that a cross-curricular assignment would enhance their understanding that learning doesn’t happen in isolated subject areas — that all content has connections. They then initiated their team professional learning around this theme.

Learning and taking action

Once the staff had started engaging in relevant professional learning, the team developed a clear outline for what students needed to do. They presented this in a mindmap format as a tool that learners could use — learners had choice around presentation (paper or digital). The mindmapping process defined the themes (curriculum content and concepts) to be used in the six-week interdisciplinary project.

Teachers then re-worded curriculum competencies in learner language for the project, which acted as guides for learners — helping them to connect concepts as they explored themes.

“It’s all about thinking: collaborating to support all learners”

The initial question put to learners was, “How does where one lives affect how one lives?”. Every subject area used this question, but had a different focus. This was new; the staff had to trust that this was going to work in many ways. They let their learners work, or not work at times, to encourage agency and self-regulation.

As the project continued, teachers found they had to collaborate, so that as learners moved from class to class they weren’t doing the same thing all day. For example, if learners were taking a research approach in STEM today, they would also be covering other useful content in another class.

Indigenous understandings

Staff worked with learners to consider the important information needed for this learning using indigenous frames first. For example, environmental concepts were adapted to the inquiry theme and applied to the Nations that learners chose to explore. Other key points were made about the focus on indigenous understandings to frame the interdisciplinary inquiry approach:

  • Staff and learners used First Peoples Principles of Learning (FPPL) as the foundation of lessons and backbone of stories to be written.
  • Learners were supported to access indigenous content, to connect to the FPPL, and then to apply these to overall learning and demonstrations of learning.
  • Some courses started with a focus on day-to-day lives of different indigenous groups they were studying.
  • Learners and staff played traditional indigenous games, or focused on athletic skills required to be part of indigenous societies (e.g., hunting skills like spearing and harpooning) — this brought areas like PE and humanities together as they explored the sense of pride gained by doing well (what might this have meant in historical indigenous communities?)

Checking

Staff worked together to develop performance-indicator rubrics, and mindmaps were assessed using this. Using questions like, “What tools and strategies did you use to help yourself improve as a learner?” helped learners with metacognition and analysis of their learning.

Learners used their mindmapping skills to summarise large topics and bring their thinking altogether, so they could reflect on their current lifestyles as well as culture and society in general.

Staff were continually helping learners to think more elastically so they could see that subjects aren’t separate, using clever questioning such as:
“How does the geographical information you learned in STEM impact on how societies operated or operate?”

Learner voice was gathered to assess the impact of this integrated inquiry approach to learning:

student testimonies

Learners liked having one main idea for every subject:

“it sort of just connect it all into one big idea”

“I am starting to learn more about aboriginal culture. I am aboriginal and I don’t know much about it, but this helped me to connect”

Mindmaps were also used to demonstrate learners making connections between what was learned in each subject area in relation to the broader theme, “How does where one lives affect how one lives?”

student mind map

The presenters shared two “Final Words” in relation to how they felt when they first started this work and how they felt when they had finished the first year:

First started: proud, creative, energised, expectant, inquisitive, excited, trusting, possibilities, overwhelmed.

After Finishing: Accomplished, future, impressed, inspired, excited, grateful, next steps, amazed, proud.

final words

CORE Offerings:

  • Inquiry Approaches Professional Learning
  • Learning Opportunities for Culturally Responsive Practice and Te Reo Māori
  • Arareo Māori PLS
  • Māori medium publications and resources
  • Te Reo Māori resources
read more
Posted in
circle in practice

Circle Time at Garibaldi Highlands School

Posted on June 2, 2017 by Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

learning intentions

We visited Garibaldi Highlands Elementary School in Squamish with our hosts, Claire, Brooke, and Tashi (see our original Canada post here for more context).

We were privileged to be invited to take part in Circle Time with a class of Grade 4 and 5 learners. This class has been building connections with First Nations communities. Circle time involves learners and teachers sitting in a circle on the floor. It is used for many purposes and in many ways, including having a lighted candle in the middle of the circle.

 

Circle

There was a talking stick held by a nominated learner who led the Circle Time by using a familiar opening that included acknowledgement of the local indigenous people:

We are honoured to be learning on the Traditional Territory of the Sḵwxwú7mesh Úxwumixw and St’át’yemc Nations.

Each person in the Circle then spoke as the talking stick was passed around. We each spoke about how we were contributing to the notion of friendship in relation to the learning intention. We were struck by the confidence and openness of each learner as they spoke about their contributions, which ranged from social actions to projects they were engaged in. We admired the learners who openly struggled to think of what to say, but who were not shy to say out loud that they were unsure or not ready to speak. Circle Time was clearly well-respected and honoured by the learners. In participating, we felt safe to share our brief pepeha and to share our gratefulness at being involved. This was a short but significant and meaningful part of our visit.

Indigenous artwork in the school foyer
Indigenous artwork in the school foyer

During our visit, we also learned about the wider context at Garibaldi Highlands Elementary School. The school has a focus on building a common language, and common structures and practices in project-based learning and inquiry, and growth mindsets.

growth chart

The school has linked their approaches to the District 48 Sea to Sky plan, which was co-constructed by learners, families, educators, and local government over a period of two to three years. This identifies the key agreed pathways to learning for District 48 learners:

pathways to learning

  • Assessment
  • Collaboration
  • Engagement
  • Play and Exploration
  • Purpose and Authenticity
  • Technology

The plan also identifies the competencies learners need to navigate these pathways:

  • Learn
  • Create and Innovate
  • Think Critically
  • Contribute
  • Collaborate

There is a no-grade project underway in District 48 and some learners at Garibaldi will not receive grades as the pilot project begins:

“All of the research and benefits of not giving grades is there, and in place of them we are giving timely feedback to students,” she said. “Instead of waiting and giving assessments in three-month intervals with report cards, we will be sending assessments regularly on the progress of students. We will be sending feedback directly to parents.” — See more at: Squamishchief: Teachers back no-grade project.

With a District Plan that has similarities to our own New Zealand Curriculum, there are some potential connections that you may want to make with this district in order to cross-pollinate.

Reflective Questions

  1. What cultural practices have you learned from your local iwi? What could you do to learn more from your local iwi or from your Māori whānau?
  2. How much importance and reverence do you place on Māori tikanga and reo? How do you model this for your learners?
  3. How might you connect with a range of educators from around the world who could learn from you with you?

CORE Offerings:
Course: Culturally Responsive Practice in School Communities

read more
Posted in
catalyst in action

Introducing Catalyst to Coordinators of Inquiry

Posted on May 15, 2017 by Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

catalyst game

As part of our work in Ladner (see our first post here), we introduced Catalyst to 25 Coordinators of Inquiry. These are lead teachers who are released about one day a week to support their colleagues to engage in Spirals of Inquiry.

A Post-It Note activity uncovered what would make the next two hours most valuable for the coordinators. As we sorted the contributions from the Coordinators, we saw three key themes. They wanted:

  • practical tools to use with their colleagues back in their context
  • a better understanding of Spirals of Inquiry
  • to learn to play Catalyst!

post-it-note inquiry

The themes this question xposed reflected our reasons for creating Catalyst. The Spiral of Inquiry encourages diverse ways of knowing, being, and doing, and so we began by getting to know one another.

Forming a circle (a familiar First Peoples process for sharing), names and three key personal words were offered from each circle member. The collaboration process and ways of knowing continued as we began the first Catalyst activity. The Papa Tāngata (or ‘people board’) offers a practical way of sharing our personal data with one another and building the relational trust needed for collaborative inquiries.

As Brooke Moore, District Principal of Inquiry and Innovation (Delta School District #37), said in her feedback, “The game creates relationships needed. Going slow at the start helps you go faster later”.

It was a delight to watch the group process taken when unpacking their Catalyst game pack. Inquiry mind-sets were clearly present — some groups had opened and explored the game pre-workshop, others waited for step-by-step facilitator instructions, while others had fully explored the game by setting it up, allocating roles, and attempting to figure it out.

As we facilitated the gameplay, groups became immersed in learning conversations prompted by the role cards which contain question stems to test assumptions, seek varied perspectives, and challenge one another’s thinking. This ability to stimulate and deepen learning conversations is a strength of the game-like tool. Catalyst has been noted as offering a ‘third point’, helping the coordinators or leaders of learning to ‘take the edge off’ the hard parts of challenging conversations. Everyone in the team has a role to play, and using the role question cards flattens the hierarchy in team learning-focussed conversations.

Brooke summarised the session and offered a challenge to the room:
“We talk a lot about analysis paralysis. This process took two hours — what could you do with the game in a whole morning?”

After the session, one of the coordinators came up to us to offer thanks and share her reflection. She confessed she was initially reluctant as she was too busy to play. She thought, ‘What are we going to have to do —  roll a dice and play a stupid game? But actually, I got heaps out of this! It was definitely useful, and I will be using Catalyst in my role. Thank you!”

catalyst analysis

read more
Posted in
tashi

Teacher Mentorship at the Delta Manor Education Centre

Posted on May 12, 2017 by Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

This post is dedicated to Hazel Owen, our amazing mentor in New Zealand and the Project Leader of uChoose, CORE’s tailored mentoring packages.

Tashi Kirincic, Coordinator of Teacher Mentorship, Delta Manor Education Centre invited us to attend her morning workshop for the Teacher Mentorship programme that the Education Centre funds. You can read more about the Mentorship programme through the Delta School District blog here. Tashi leads the education of mentors engaged in the programme which has run for about three years. There are currently 16 Mentors and 60 Protégés involved in the programme.

Tashi’s session with the small group of attending mentors started with the reading of a First Nations poem by the Elders of the Hopi Nation:

To My Fellow Swimmers: http://www.shambhala.com/images/illus/Prophecy.pdf

The following parts of the poem were particularly relevant to the group reflections on their recent experiences and next steps:

“And I say see who is there with you and celebrate. At this time in history, we are to take nothing personally, least of all ourselves. For the moment that we do, our spiritual growth and journey comes to a halt.

The time of the lone wolf is over. Gather yourselves. Banish the word ‘struggle’ from your attitude and your vocabulary.”

tashi
Tashi posing a question to the group

mentoring matters

A key question of the group in this session was “How can we best support our peers so they embrace and model wise practice?”. This question was accompanied by an artwork by First Nations artist Susan Pointe called Full Circle. The image of circling salmon can be interpreted in many ways. Tashi uses the image to encourage thinking and conversations about spiralling towards a common goal. Each salmon can be seen as representing a different group forming a whole. Balancing points can be seen as significant in terms of equal contribution between group members. Another effective analogy for teamwork is that different salmon take different paths but are all heading to the same place and have the same ultimate purpose.

The group is using Mentoring Matters (Lipton and Wellman) to guide their learning and practice and today the group spent time unpacking the theoretical model for Structured Learning Focused Conversations. This model is flexible and cyclical:
cycle

After reading about this model, the team came up with a word, a phrase and a sentence to represent the parts of the reading that resonated for them and then rich conversations emerged from these:
jottings

As mentors in the use of Spirals of Inquiry, we found it refreshing to share our practice with these classroom teachers who were released once a week to mentor their protégés. We had much in common with them and in unpacking a theoretical model together, we could engage in metacognition to consider improvements in our own practice.

The team also reviewed their year of mentorship and considered new ways to operate the programme to make the mentoring more effective for their protégés. It caused us to wonder, ‘Have we thought about the following in our own mentoring programmes that we deliver in schools?’

  • Give time for mentors and mentees to get away together – to build relationships in order to become more effective together during the year. Enable people to bring their families with them.
  • Consider the gaps between sessions and whether they are too long or too short depending on context.
  • Consider the ideal number in group mentoring – what is working and what isn’t? Why?
  • Have an overarching vision co-constructed for the mentoring (e.g. a Support-Challenge vision).
  • Plan a whole year of mentoring in your school, ECE or kura — including events, reviews of how it is going, specific learning opportunities for mentoring (e.g. how to mentor, change leadership) and celebrations.

To set goals with mentees, consider asking a question to help them think broadly. For example, Brooke Moore asks “In a year from now when you look back, what will you regard with pride and accomplishment?”

Our takeaways from this session included the following:

  • Mentoring is about Creating Reflective Practitioners!
  • Goal setting conversations can have flexible structure to them and can be based on theory.
  • Mentors can and should model and extend the habits of goal driven thinking.
  • Mentors can introduce topics to explore to add to a mentee’s current awareness. This involves consolidation and extension of professional thinking and habits of mind.
  • Asking your mentee to weigh priorities can be a useful approach to working through complexity.
  • A mentor can help a mentee to organise and integrate learning – to widen the conversation from immediate issues to the bigger picture through building habits of reflection. (e.g. So what is the bigger issue or concern here?)

Reflective questions related to Spirals:

  • Mentoring capabilities are crucial to implementing Spirals of Inquiry. How do you foster these qualities in yourself and in your colleagues?
  • External expertise and a neutral mentor is sometimes the key to creating reflective practitioners. How do you decide on which courses or mentors are most suitable for you or your team?

CORE offerings:

  • uChoose virtual mentoring packages
  • Change Management Courses

 

read more
Posted in

Spirals of Inquiry BC Tour: Live blogging series

Posted on May 11, 2017 by Rebbecca Sweeney and Suzi Gould

Kia ora from Ladner, Delta! Suzi Gould (@SuziGould2) and Becc Sweeney (@beccasweeney) are Live Blogging and Tweeting from Ladner and Vancouver about learning innovations we come across as we engage with BC educators over the next ten days.

Our main purpose while here is to bring Catalyst: the collaborative inquiry game to the Network of Innovation and Inquiry (NOII) Symposium. We introduced Catalyst to Linda Kaser and Judy Halbert during its development and they recommended that we play with a focus group of the leaders/teachers who they work with.

We are very gratefully being hosted by these Catalyst focus group players, and incredibly generous women, who work to support and mentor Delta, BC educators through the Delta School District:

Claire D’Aoust – Coordinator of Primary Learning, Delta Manor Education Centre
Brooke Moore – District Principal of Inquiry and Innovation (Delta School District #37)
Tashi Kirincic – Coordinator of Teacher Mentorship, Delta Manor Education Centre

catalyst

Farm Roots

Farm Roots
Farm Roots is a mini-school trial focused on providing learners with an alternative style of learning that uses a project-based approach to learning. Farm Roots is specifically designed around learning the curriculum through an agricultural lens as many learners in the Ladner area are from families working in this industry.

brooke moore

Brooke Moore, District Principal of Inquiry and Innovation (Delta School District #37) has led the implementation of Farm Roots in Delta over the past year. We loved listening in on her conversations with two learners, Georgia and Brooke, as she asked them about the impact of Farm Roots on their learning over the past year:

“In this school we might experiment or go outside and do what we actually talked about. We don’t forget what we learn” – Georgia

“We want teachers to know that this way we learn a lot more. We enjoy it more. We are not in the classroom all day long. – Georgia

The learning at Farm Roots is visible at the school. Their learning plans can be seen transformed into actual gardens as we explored Farm Roots.

planting plans

planters

Learning is also visible beyond the school. For example, the Grade 12 learners studied global water systems and ended up presenting their learning to local government. Their learning foci ranged across:

  1. sustainable farming
  2. policy recommendations
  3. personal learning they had achieved on the farm
  4. levels of bureaucracy in relation to applying for permits (for example)
  5. farming business models.

Other learners investigated ways to deal with a First Nations archaeological site that they discovered when preparing land at the school for farming. They ended up working with local government and archaeologists to establish protocols for further digging.

big ideas

The secondary teachers in this project are learning a lot about differentiated learning and teaching, and about how practical application of learning can transfer to grades without putting grades first. You can see videos of what people are saying about Farm Roots here (including what learners are saying).

Reflective questions:

  • How can project based learning address engagement and achievement challenges that we face in our regular state schools?
  • How can we learn from pilot projects like the above and transfer the pedagogical findings into all school or kura contexts?
  • What can we do right now to make learning more active, relevant and memorable for our learners?

CORE offerings:
Online courses: Inquiry Approaches

 

read more
Posted in
Subscribe to our emails
Make an Enquiry
Subscribe to our emails
Make an Enquiry

© 2023 CORE Education Policies
0800 267 301
© 2023 CORE Education
0800 267 301